[Laszlo-dev] For Review: Change 20081030-bargull-qYS Summary: adjust lzconsoledebug check

[P T Withington]

I didn't understand your comment.  You said 'test for the same  
condition as in swf9'.  I understand now you are just correcting the  
test to test for the same value (so I can no longer enable the console  
debugger by saying `?lzconsoledebug=false`. (!)

But that makes me curious.  Should we allow just `?lzconsoledebug`,  
that is, just naming the option, without a value?  Or should we always  
require that you give a value?

And, as an aside, there is:

http://jira.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-3479

which would solve the issue we currently have where you cannot invoke  
fdb on a non-debug .lzx, because fdb always adds `?debug=true` to the  
url that it fetches.

On 2008-10-31, at 08:29EDT, André Bargull wrote:

> This is swf8-only, no need to worry about swf9.
>
> On 10/30/2008 7:21 PM, P T Withington wrote:
>> Does `global[lzconsoledebug]` actually work in swf9?  Or should we  
>> be using the platform-specific code to look for url query param  
>> named `lzconsoldebug`?
>> On 2008-10-30, at 12:41EDT, André Bargull wrote:
>>> Change 20081030-bargull-qYS by bargull at dell--p4--2-53 on  
>>> 2008-10-30 17:39:10
>>> in /home/Admin/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
>>> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>>>
>>> Summary: adjust lzconsoledebug check
>>>
>>> New Features:
>>>
>>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-7107
>>>
>>> Technical Reviewer: ptw
>>> QA Reviewer: (pending)
>>> Doc Reviewer: (pending)
>>>
>>> Documentation:
>>>
>>> Release Notes:
>>>
>>> Details:
>>> Test for the same condition as in swf9
>>>
>>>
>>> Tests:
>>>
>>> Files:
>>> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/debugger/platform/swf/LzDebug.as
>>>
>>> Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20081030-bargull-qYS.tar
>>>
>>>
>