[Laszlo-dev] For Review: Change 20081024-lou-6 Summary: reference, lz.node: expand datapath description

[André Bargull]

There is just one problem (is it?): it's not a real union, it's a String 
for write and lz.DataNodeMixin for read - hey wait, it's a lz.datapath 
for read!

On 10/24/2008 6:45 PM, P T Withington wrote:
> The proposed JS2 syntax for union types is:
> 
> ( type | type )
> 
> Not that anything will actually accept that.  But I would prefer using 
> what I expect will be the eventual syntax rather than making up a new 
> one.  So, I would use:
> 
> ( lz.datanode | String )
> 
> 
> On 2008-10-24, at 12:23EDT, André Bargull wrote:
> 
>> I don't whether "lz.datanode/String" for `@type` resp. 
>> "datanode/string" for `@lzxtype` are valid in the context they're 
>> used. (But on the other hand I don't know a better representation than 
>> to use "/".)
>> Apart from that, `lz.datanode` (actually `lz.DataNode`) has been 
>> deprecated in favor of `lz.DataNodeMixin`.
>>
>> Otherwise approved!
>>
>> On 10/24/2008 3:14 PM, Lou Iorio wrote:
>>> Change 20081024-lou-6 by lou at loumac.local on 2008-10-24 09:09:45 AST
>>>    in /Users/lou/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
>>>    for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>>> Summary: reference, lz.node: expand datapath description
>>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-6942
>>> Technical Reviewer: (pending)
>>> QA Reviewer: (pending)
>>> Doc Reviewer: andre
>>> Details: add information from JIRA
>>> Tests: visual verify
>>> Files:
>>> M      WEB-INF/lps/lfc/core/LzNode.lzs
>>> Changeset: 
>>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20081024-lou-6.tar
>>
> 
>