[Laszlo-dev] For Review: Change 20081113-lou-C Summary:, lz.param: clarify return type in the reference, fix nav pane entries

Lou Iorio lou at louiorio.com
Fri Nov 14 07:00:26 PST 2008


Ah, so what should this be?

         <!--- Returns value.
             @return String: the string representing the value. -->
         <method name="getValue">
           return this.value;
         </method>


On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:33 PM, André Bargull wrote:

> Not approved, because lz.param#getValue() may return any type, not  
> just strings (the value-attribute is an expression not a string,  
> too!).
> The limitation for String does only apply to LzParam aka lz.Param  
> aka lz.params, but not to lz.param! (hey, I didn't choose those  
> names...)
> (Ghost used LzParam and they wondered why it just returns strings in  
> swf9, and they said the documentation does not cover this aspect,  
> but they used the wrong reference: lz.param instead of LzParam.)
>
>> Change 20081113-lou-C by lou at loumac.local on 2008-11-13 11:42:04 AST
>>     in /Users/lou/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
>>     for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>>
>> Summary: lz.param: clarify return type in the reference, fix nav  
>> pane  entries
>>
>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-7327, LPP-7323
>>
>> Technical Reviewer: (pending)
>> QA Reviewer: (pending)
>> Doc Reviewer: Tucker
>>
>> Details: document that getValue() returns String
>> move lz.param to RCP category
>> add lz.Param to Data category
>>
>> Tests: visual verify
>>
>> Files:
>> M      docs/src/nav/toc.xml
>> M      lps/components/rpc/rpc.lzx
>>
>>
>> Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20081113-lou-C.tar
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/attachments/20081114/725dd2e3/attachment.html


More information about the Laszlo-dev mailing list