[Laszlo-dev] [Laszlo-checkins] r8880 - openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/data

[P T Withington]

Aieee!!

I have just been going around and changing the types on the pages that  
I am working on to be of the form:

   [*]

to mean an array of anything.  I notice that this causes the doc tool  
to drop my documentation altogether.  What is the one true way?

Can I say:

   Array *

Seems bizarre to me, I would have bought Array(*).  Is this some  
docbook convention where it has its own type specification system or  
something?

On 2008-04-29, at 01:02 EDT, hqm at openlaszlo.org wrote:

> Author: hqm
> Date: 2008-04-28 22:02:03 -0700 (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
> New Revision: 8880
>
> Modified:
>   openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/data/LzDatapath.lzs
> Log:
> Change 20080429-hqm-2 by hqm at badtzmaru.home on 2008-04-29 01:01:06 EDT
>    in /Users/hqm/openlaszlo/trunk5
>    for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>
> Summary: docs fix for LzDatapath
>
> New Features:
>
> Bugs Fixed: LPP-5567
>
> Technical Reviewer: liorio
> QA Reviewer: (pending)
> Doc Reviewer: (pending)
>
> Documentation:
>
> Release Notes:
>
> Details:
>
> use arg datatypes which doc tools understands
>
> Tests:
>
>
>
> Modified: openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/data/LzDatapath.lzs
> ===================================================================
> --- openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/data/LzDatapath.lzs	2008-04-29  
> 00:36:03 UTC (rev 8879)
> +++ openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/data/LzDatapath.lzs	2008-04-29  
> 05:02:03 UTC (rev 8880)
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
>   * henceforth the replication set can *only* be controlled by calling
>   * setNodes.
>   *
> -  * @param [LzDataElement] nodes: A list of LzDataElements to  
> replicate over.
> +  * @param Array nodes: A list of LzDataElements to replicate over.
>   */
> function setNodes ( nodes ){
>     //Debug.write( "before context" ,this.context );
> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@
> /**
>   * Sets the comparator for the sort used by the replication manager.
>   *
> -  * @param Function|String comparator: "ascending" or "descending"  
> for the
> +  * @param Function comparator: "ascending" or "descending" for the
>   * appropriate dictionary sort, or a function to be used for  
> comparison that
>   * takes two arguments and returns 1 if the second argument should  
> follow the
>   * first, -1 if the first argument should follow the second, and 0  
> if the two
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Laszlo-checkins mailing list
> Laszlo-checkins at openlaszlo.org
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-checkins