[Laszlo-dev] [Resent] For Review: Change 20070210-ptw-k Summary: svn merge -r 3748:3749 http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/branches/legals

[P T Withington]

I have to admit confusion.  I have been treating trunk as 3.4.1.  Is  
that wrong?

On 2007-02-18, at 17:00 EST, Jim Grandy wrote:

> Yes; let's hold this change out of 3.4 for now. As for whether it  
> goes into trunk, I see two arguments: one, to integrate, that it  
> gets the change into an active tree sooner, and the other, to hold,  
> that simplifies trunk->3.4.x merging. I'm leaning toward  
> integrating into trunk, but I'm interested in other opinions.
>
> jim
>
> On Feb 17, 2007, at 7:26 AM, P T Withington wrote:
>
>> [Resent: awaiting your 'administrative' review before I make this  
>> integration.  I think this is an important swf generation bug fix  
>> to backport, but it will prevent QA-ing by comparing binaries  
>> because it will change the code generator output.]
>>
>> Change 20070210-ptw-k by ptw at dueling-banjos.local on 2007-02-10  
>> 17:19:44 EST
>>     in /Users/ptw/OpenLaszlo/3.4
>>
>> Summary: svn merge -r 3748:3749 http://svn.openlaszlo.org/ 
>> openlaszlo/branches/legals
>>
>> Bugs Fixed:
>> LPP-2366: 'Fix SWF compiler forward branch bug that keeps appearing'
>> LPP-NaN: 'Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x11'
>> LPP-NaN: 'FSCommand2. This is a new opcode in FL2 (Flash Lite 2)  
>> that is used for all mobile-specific functionality.'
>>
>> Technical Reviewer: jgrandy (pending)
>> QA Reviewer: mamye (pending)
>> Doc Reviewer: n/a
>>
>> Tests:
>>     smokecheck
>>     LFC's flasm without error
>>
>> Files:
>> M      WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/Actions.java
>> M      WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/Instructions.java
>> M      WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/Assembler.java
>> M      WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/CodeGenerator.java
>>
>> Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20070210- 
>> ptw-k.tar