[Laszlo-dev] bug in event init process
P T Withington
ptw at openlaszlo.org
Fri Jun 23 17:55:50 EDT 2006
That sounds like a good idea to me. It certainly would unobfuscate
things a bit.
Shall I assign http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-1326 to you?
On 2006-06-23, at 17:31 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:
> Should we add a new arg that's passed in to the runtime? That is,
> we now
> pass in
> a list of attributes, $events (handlers), and $refs (constraints).
> Should we
> also pass in something
> which is the list of declared events, which should get initialized
> to the
> sentinel event?
> Maybe we should rename $refs to $constraints, and $events to
> $eventhandlers,and add $events as the new
> On 6/23/06, Henry Minsky <henry.minsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah I think now would be better than later.
>> A declared event needs to get initialized to something, and it has to
>> happen pretty early.
>> We're using the sentinel object now, there was some talk of making
>> it so
>> the compiler expanded
>> sendEvent to do a check for null instead? I guess we can overlap
>> implementations, and if the
>> compiler check is implemented then we could then just bind the
>> object to null..
>> > > Sounds like it should definitely be initialized to the sentinel
>> > > array...
>> > As the TODO says, this is a fragile area of the tag compiler
>> > from treating an event declaration as an attribute declaration. It
>> > might work to use the sentinel event instead of null, but
>> perhaps we
>> > want to consider if now is the time to split events from
More information about the Laszlo-dev