[Laszlo-dev] [Laszlo-builds] FAILURE for 1056-openlaszlo-branches-legals on linux-builder.corp.laszlosystems.com
P T Withington
ptw at openlaszlo.org
Mon Jun 19 13:16:49 EDT 2006
We have builds building again. r1060 conditionalized the places that
were looking for a swf version number when they weren't building a
swf. Henry is going to stomp out the places that are tripping over
$swf6 no longer being defined...
On 2006-06-19, at 12:20 EDT, Jim Grandy wrote:
> Let's invest in getting it right rather than backing it out. This
> is the kind of thing that incurs incremental long-term cost if we
> don't try to make it as clean as possible.
> Perhaps Tucker and Henry can look at this today, with an eye toward
> Henry being able to fix any further issues that come up this week.
> On Jun 19, 2006, at 9:01 AM, P T Withington wrote:
>> I took out the hack that pretended that dhtml was a swf runtime. It
>> isn't. I guess there is more crap to root out. It would be sad to
>> have to put the hack back.
>> The speed is just r1049. Henry knows as well as I that the mechanism
>> for adding a new runtime is messy and we just try to make it a little
>> cleaner each time. Clearly some of my clean up uncovered some baling
>> wire and twine...
>> On 2006-06-19, at 09:33 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote:
>>> Tucker, I think this one's you:
>>> [exec] Entering runlztest.sh with LPS_HOME=/home/svnbuild/
>>> [exec] testing test/lztest/lztest-node.lzx ..............
>>> [exec] including xml test/lztest/../../lps/utils/
>>> [exec] Compilation errors occurred:
>>> [exec] lztest-node.lzx:1:9: 'dhtml' is not a SWF runtime
>>> Maybe we've been rushing you too much through the compiler switch
>>> work? Can you bring Henry and me up to speed on it (maybe more
>>> Henry than me) before you empumpkinate?
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> benjamin shine
>>> software engineer
>>> ben at laszlosystems.com
>> Laszlo-dev mailing list
>> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
More information about the Laszlo-dev