[Laszlo-dev] Do LzParams really need to shadow setters?

[P T Withington]

I'm still stomping out __proto__'s from the LFC.  The LzParam  
construct method creates a shadow hash for it's setters.  Does it  
really need to do that?  If so, can you explain why, so I can put a  
comment here?

Index: LzParam.lzs
===================================================================
--- LzParam.lzs	(revision 1016)
+++ LzParam.lzs	(working copy)
@@ -27,9 +27,10 @@
// 
======================================================================== 
======
LzParam.prototype.construct = function ( parent , args ){
      super.construct( parent, args );
-    var mysetters ={};
-    mysetters.__proto__ = this.setters;
-    this.setters = mysetters;
+    // TODO: [2006-06-16 ptw] Do LzParam instances really need to have
+    // their own private setters?  Or is this some holdover from the
+    // old class system?
+    this.setters = new LzInheritedHash(this.setters);
      // construct
      this.d = {};
}