[Laszlo-dev] For Review: Summary: Making the LFC aware of whether it needs to be rebuilt.

[P T Withington]

There are no .lzx files in the LFC, but it would be good if the LFC  
considered itself out of date if it is older than the compiler.

Not sure it is worth having separate up to date checks for the  
flavors of LFC.  In the good old days of make, you could have had a  
'make depend' step that would enumerate the dependencies, but in the  
modern, efficient, ant days, it just seems like asking for trouble to  
create even more places that have to be kept in sync to make the  
dependencies work.

On 2006-06-10, at 20:57 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote:

>
> Summary: Making the LFC aware of whether it needs to be rebuilt.
>
> New Features: The lfc will not rebuild if the source hasn't changed.
>
> Bugs Fixed: LPP-2134, Make lfc build.xml aware of whether sources  
> are up to date
>
> Technical Reviewer: ptw (pending)
> QA Reviewer: frisco (pending)
> Doc Reviewer: (pending)
>
> Documentation:
>
> Release Notes:
>
> Details:
>
> Tests:
>
> Files:
>
>
> <WEB-INF-lps-lfc-build.xml.diff>
>
>
> benjamin shine
> software engineer
> ben at laszlosystems.com
>
>
>