[Laszlo-dev] Proposal: LzFontmanager.getSystemFonts function

[Cortlandt Winters]

Thank you David,

That seems better. System is more vague too. 

I Will change to this unless anyone else has a further improvment.

-Cort

> -----Original Message-----
> From: laszlo-dev-bounces at openlaszlo.org
> [mailto:laszlo-dev-bounces at openlaszlo.org]On Behalf Of David Temkin
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:43 AM
> To: cort at notebookmargins.com; Laszlo-dev
> Subject: Re: [Laszlo-dev] Proposal: LzFontmanager.getSystemFonts
> function
> 
> 
> This sounds useful. For the name, how about using the terminology used in
> the docs? They use the term "client fonts"*, so this would be
> getClientFonts() --
> 
> http://www.laszlosystems.com/lps-3.0/docs/guide/fonts.html
> 
> *I also found a couple of references to "device fonts" that should be
> changed
> 
> 
> > From: Cortlandt Winters <cort at notebookmargins.com>
> > Reply-To: <cort at notebookmargins.com>
> > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:11:43 -0400
> > To: Laszlo-dev <laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org>
> > Subject: [Laszlo-dev] Proposal: LzFontmanager.getSystemFonts function
> > 
> > Hello Folk,
> > 
> > This is a pretty simple proposal.
> > 
> > LzFontManager doesn't have a public function to get the system 
> fonts, which
> > would be pretty useful and easy to implement ala'
> > 
> > LzFontManager.getSystemFonts = function () {
> >    return TextField.getFontList();
> > }
> > 
> > Does this make sense to folk? Any reasons against it or 
> thoughts on a better
> > name?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > -Cort
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Laszlo-dev mailing list
> > Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
> > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> Laszlo-dev at openlaszlo.org
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>